If I where to apply for the RCMP next year after I graduate I can almost 100% guarantee I would be turned away. My dad who is friends with the local detachment's recruiter tells us that they are gearing towards minorities and women.
The department I used to work for awarded five hiring points for legacy. That was written corporate policy back then. There are generations of families on the job. The police and fire departments are also multi-generational. It is apparent at every graduation parade. Perhaps the RCMP is similar? Times have changed, and legacy points are no longer ( officially ) awarded, but, even now, it can't hurt to have family inside any organization you are interested in joining put in a good word for you with the right people. Or, at least let it ( casually ) be known during the application / interview process that you have family on the job. "Why are you interested in joining us?" "I want to Serve and Protect, and my father always had good things to say about the force."
I think legacy was common practice in many organizations, and to a degree, still is.
This from Princeton University 1958:
“The Princeton son does not have to compete against non-Princeton sons,” the Alumni Council assured. “No matter how many other boys apply, the Princeton son is judged from an academic standpoint solely on this one question: Can he be expected to graduate? If so, he’s admitted. If not, he’s not admitted. It’s as simple as that.”
The story went on to say, "Legacies were accepted at twice the rate of non-legacies in the days of the pamphlet. But today ( 2010 ), legacies are accepted at roughly four times the rate of non-legacies."
And once in the field it can take years to fire someone (if you can).
September 17, 2010
"RCMP discipline process can drag on for years, documents show: OTTAWA - The longest wait, right now, is six years.":
http://www2.canada.com/nanaimodailynews/news/story.html?id=3542034